got root?
Sunday, January 14, 2007
texan argumentation formula
sneakysid: Da, americanii sunt o natie de cretini

At the end of the referenced video [from sneakysid's post] we see a new method for convincing one's peers of the superiority of one's own argument: it has been dubbed the "texan boy argument" by a friend of mine and refined to be the basis of the "texan argumentation formula" which is something like this:


  • find a controversial topic, such as war, religion or operating systems

  • choose a side, generally that which is more likely to be the winner

  • when defending or promoting your choice rely exclusively on phrases such as "it is obvious i'm right", "only a moron could think the opposite", "i support X because i believe in god" etc

  • when confronted and asked to expand on said argument reply with a variation of "are you stupid? it's obvious!" or maybe "i can't explain this to morons"

  • bask in the superiority of your debate techniques and the inherent glory which they will undoubtedly bring



If you doubt the effectiveness of this formula, remember that 80 million people were, at some point, convinced in a similar fashion.

Labels: ,

Comments: Post a Comment  | | Home



previously
 iPhone
 Ruby on Rails
 Cultures
 Democracy Player
 cellphone jamming
 sudo
 security by having large balls?
 macheist
 'g33k mafia' part deux
 geek mafia


archive
 June 2005
 July 2005
 November 2005
 December 2005
 January 2006
 February 2006
 March 2006
 April 2006
 May 2006
 June 2006
 July 2006
 August 2006
 September 2006
 October 2006
 November 2006
 December 2006
 January 2007


feedroll
 zoso
 nihasa
 andressa
 deea
 znuff
 lightning
 sneakysid
 eloa
 curtezana
 jen
 puttycat
 lilbro
 dooda
 eduard
 qdb.us
 f.bash.ro
 bash.ro
 brinkerhoff
 overheard.ro
 fergie
 googlemac


misc
 

AttributionShareAlike

Powered by Blogger